Shaikh Banubi Shaikh Nizam v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CA No.287/2018 (950)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.287 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9928 OF 2017 Shaikh Banubi Shaikh Nizam .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.. Respondents Dr. S.D. Tawshikar and Mr Syed Farhan S.A., Advocates for applicant Mr A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 4 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ Date : 9th March 2018 PER COURT 1.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the Bailiff report states that respondent no.8 is not found. According to him, the address in the cause title is the last known address. Learned Counsel submits that petitioner be allowed to serve respondent no.8 by paper proclamation notice.

2.

The petitioner shall serve respondent no.8 by paper proclamation service I..e. by paper proclamation in daily 'Lokmat'. C.A. Disposed of.

( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

CA No.287/2018 (950) vvr