Yogesh Suresh Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) ca13545.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13545 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8372 OF 2016 Yogesh s/o. Suresh Patil ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.D. Munde, AGP for respndent/State.

Mr.A.R. Syed h/f. Mr.S.P. Brahme, Advocate for R-3. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.

DATED :

10.11.2017 P.C. :- 1.

Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.P. and Mr. Syed, learned Counsel for non-applicant. The applicant seeks leave to amend. 2.

The writ petition is not yet admitted. Even otherwise the non-applicant will have every right to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment by filing affidavit to the writ petition.

( 2 ) ca13545.17 3.

In view of above, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Necessary amendment be carried out within 14 days. The Civil Application is disposed of.

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] /2017/ 17/ snk NOV ca13545.17