Executive Engineer Lower Dudhna Project Selu v. Vimalbai Dnyanoba Borade And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.448 OF 2015 WITH CA/12217/2014 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NIMNA DUDHNA PROJECT SELU DNYANOBA DADARAO MHASKE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. A. M. Phule Advocate for Respondent /s : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
FIRST APPEAL NO.450 OF 2015 WITH CA/11664/2014 BHAGWAN GANGARAM BORADE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. R. B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
FIRST APPEAL NO.457 OF 2015 WITH CA/10772/2014 INDUBAI PANDURANG AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S.N. Morampalle
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
FIRST APPEAL NO.459 OF 2015 WITH CA/10202/2014 ANNAPURNABAI MURLIDHAR KAKADE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. R. B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
.....
FIRST APPEAL NO.3 OF 2016 VIMALBAI DNYANOBA BORADE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
.....
FIRST APPEAL NO.5 OF 2016 TUKARAM APPARAO BAHEKAR AND OTHERS
AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. R. B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
.....
FIRST APPEAL NO.6 OF 2016 SUMANBAI BHAURAO BORADE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. R. B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2: Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
....
FIRST APPEAL NO.8 OF 2016 DILIP ASARAM MHASKE AND OTHERS AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat.
CORAM : SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2018.
PER COURT 1.
This is motion for speaking to minutes filed by the appellant, to add words "settled and" in para 2 before the last word "withdrawn" in the order dated 12th December 2018. 2.
Mr.Rajendra Sanap, learned Counsel holding for Mr. A.R. Kharat, submits that the claimant has no objection if the word "settled and" are added in para 2 of the order. 3.
Thus, it appears that the dispute is settled in between the claimants and Acquiring Body. Therefore, in para 2, line No.2 of the order before the word "withdrawn", the words "settled and" be added. 4.
In the title clause, instead of the name of Smt. Asha Rakh, the name of A.R. Kharat Advocate be substituted. 5.
After making necessary correction, order be uploaded. 6.
The motion is disposed of accordingly.
[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] vdd/-