Keshav Rajaram Patil v. Bhaiyasaheb Rajaram Patil

CA-15882.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15882 of 2015 in SECOND APPEAL NO. 702 OF 2015 Keshav Rajaram Patil ..

Applicant vs Bhaiyasaheb Rajaram Patil ..

Respondent ----- Mr. Girish S. Rane, Advocate for applicant Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Advocate for respondent CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

8TH DECEMBER, 2015 ORDER:

1.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Having considered the submissions, I deem it appropriate that corpus of the property needs to be preserved with the parties during pendency of the appeal.

2.

As such, during pendency of second appeal, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (A) of civil application. 3.

Civil application stands disposed of.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

pnd