← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/842/2016admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Rameshwar S/O Khumaram Chaudhary v. Sanjay S/O Uttam Ruppanwar And Another

2018-06-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane1 pages

{1} 20 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2016 IN FAST/34769/2015 RAMESHWAR S/O KHUMARAM CHAUDHARY

VERSUS

SANJAY S/O UTTAM RUPPANWAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ram S. Shinde CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 18th JUNE , 2018.

PER COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Chapalgaonkar, learned counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.3 and undertakes to file VP within two weeks. Despite service of notice, none appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Perused the application.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, there is no impediment to condone the delay of 90 days caused in filing the first appeal. Accordingly, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Delay caused for filing the first appeal is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process. On registration of appeal, issue notice to respondents. Mr. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate waives notice for respondent No.3. Call for R. & P. from the concerned Tribunal. After receipt of R. & P. list the matter for admission in due course.

[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-