Bapusaheb Uttamrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15552 OF 2015 IN FAST/34777/2015 WITH CA/15553/2015 IN FAST/34779/2015 WITH CA/15554/2015 IN FAST/34783/2015 WITH CA/15555/2015 IN FAST/34781/2015 BAPUSAHEB UTTAMRAO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Patil Indrale Anand V. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : S.R. Yadav ...

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED : 8th February, 2016.

PER COURT :

1.

In delay condonation applications, heard the learned counsel for original claimants, applicants and also learned AGP. Nobody has turned up for Acquiring Body. In view of the contents of the applications and submissions made, this Court holds that sufficient cause is shown. So, the applications filed for condonation of delay are allowed. Delay is condoned. 2.

Notice in appeals. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Notice to respondent No. 3 made returnable on 21.6.2016. Call record and proceeding. [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/