← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/14625/2017disposed offdismissed for default

The Mukhyadhikari Nagar Parishad Kalamb v. Chandrasen Govardhan Kamble

2019-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.14620 OF 2017 THE MUKHYADHIKARI NAGAR PARISHAD KALAMB

VERSUS

SATISH BABURAO JHADKE AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14621 OF 2017 THE MUKHYADHIKARI NAGAR PARISHAD KALAMB

VERSUS

SUMIT S/O RAJKUMAR GAIKWAD AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14622 OF 2017 THE MUKHYADHIKARI NAGAR PARISHAD KALAMB

VERSUS

NITIN ARUN GARAD AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14625 OF 2017 THE MUKHYADHIKARI NAGAR PARISHAD KALAMB

VERSUS

CHANDRASEN GOVARDHAN KAMBLE ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri B. R. Sontakke Patil Advocate for the Respondents : Shri D. S. Kudle ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 05th JULY, 2019.

...

PER COURT :

1.

Shri Sontakke learned Advocate submits that in the Writ

Petition wherein the sole respondent Shri Chandrasen Govardhan Kamble is involved, the petitions would become infructuous as Shri Kamble has passed away. The learned Advocate Shri Kudle confirms the statement that the sole respondent/original complainant has passed away. 2.

In view of the above, Writ Petition No. 14625/2017 stands abated.

3.

Shri Kudle learned Advocate appearing on behalf of all the respondent workers in the remaining three petitions commenced his submissions. It was noticed that in the first petition, there are seven workers involved. In the second petition, there are three workers involved and in the third petition, there are nine workers involved. Shri Sontakke submits that though he has prepared a rough chart of the dates of joining of these workers and the periods of their work, the said chart will have to be properly typed out and will have to be submitted to the Court. Shri Kudle submits that he would also prefer to prepare such a comparative chart based on the conclusions drawn by the Industrial Court meaning thereby

that the chart would contain such dates which the Industrial Court has accepted as being the dates of joining. 4.

Shri Sontakke submits that he would not be available till 10/07/2019 considering that a close relative would be getting married in that period. On his request, matter is kept on 11/07/2019 as ''part-heard.'' The learned Advocate Shri Kudle consents to have the matter on the same date. 5.

Stand over to 11/07/2019 as ''part-heard.''

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) shp/-