Pratap Vishwanath Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 931 CA-6140.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6140 OF 2019 IN FAST/34499/2018 PRATAP VISHWANATH PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

03.03.2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 2469 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 2469 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matters belatedly.

4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde