← Library
Bombay High CourtRA/102/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Jaykumar Punamchand Bakliwal v. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad And Others

2017-12-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

102.14REVISION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 102 OF 2014 IN WP/8966/2013 JAYKUMAR PUNAMCHAND BAKLIWAL

VERSUS

THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the applicant : Mr. R.V. Gore Advocate for respondent/State : Mrs. Deepali S. Jape ...

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J Dated: December 07, 2017 ...

Learned counsel appearing for the review applicant, on instructions, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments/events occurred after filing of this review application, this review application has rendered infructuous.

2.

In the light of the statement of learned counsel appearing for the review

102.14REVISION applicant, review application is disposed of as infructuous.

(S.S. SHINDE, J) SGA/