Ashokbhau Chavan Bahu Udeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Through Its Secretary Prakash Bhaurao Dhone v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others
947-wp-12962-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 947 WRIT PETITION NO. 12962 OF 2022 ASHOKBHAU CHAVAN BAHU UDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY PRAKASH BHAURAO DHONE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...
Mr. B. P. Gonare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1 and 3 - State. Ms. Nikita Gore, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2. Mr. V. P. Narwade and Mr. M. V. Narwade, Advocate for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6.
...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 28th MARCH, 2024.
ORDER :- .
Leave to delete respondent No.4 is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.
2.
Present petition is filed for directing the respondents to reimburse the fees of the children who have been admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 3.
The learned Advocate for the petitioner, the learned AGP, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Advocate for respondent No.4 to 6 submits that the petition can be disposed of in view of the fact that similar matter i.e. Writ Petition No.2819 of 2021 came up before this Court, Bench at Nagpur. It appears that prior to that Coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.7672 of 2022 (Vivekanand Academy of Human Excellence, Chimangaon, Tal. [1]
947-wp-12962-2022.odt Koregaon Vs. State of Maharashtra) with companion petitions, had passed order on 21.09.2023, wherein the respondents were directed to scrutinize the case of the petitioners regarding eligibility and quantum of amount to be reimbursed.
4.
Here also, it appears that present petitioner had made representations and, therefore, we follow the same course of action. 5.
Writ Petition is disposed of by giving directions that the case of the petitioner shall be scrutinized by the authority concerned within a period of four weeks, in the light of the directions in paragraph No.4 in Writ Petition No.7672 of 2022, which runs as under :- "4.
The respondents will have to scrutinize case of the Petitioner as regards eligibility, quantum and thereafter will have to take necessary steps. Learned AGP on instructions states that cases of each of the Petitioner would be scrutinized within a period of two weeks. So as to ensure that there is no further time sought on behalf of the Respondents, we grant four weeks time to the Respondents. Within this period the case of each of the Petitioner would be scrutinized and the eligibility, quantum be determined by the concerned Respondent. The amount admissible to the Petitioners should be released within a period of two weeks thereafter. If the Petitioners are not entitled then the order to that effect be passed. If the Petitioners are aggrieved by total denial or partial disbursement of the amount claimed by them, it is open to them to take such action as is permissible in law." [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]