Prashant Ramlal Kolhare And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:2192-DB 912-CA.12810.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12810 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3164 OF 2016 Prashant Ramlal Kolhare & Ors.

..

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3164 OF 2016 Prashant Ramlal Kolhare & Ors.

..

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents ____________ Mr. B. V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent-State.

Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Mr. S. S. Jangada h/f. Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No.4.

Mr. V. P. Latange, Advocate for Respondent No.6. ____________ CORAM :

MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE :

24th JANUARY 2025 P.C.:- 1.

Civil application has been moved in the light of the supervening circulars seeking 50% concession in the additional lease premium in respect of the plot obtained on lease from the CIDCO, Tauseef

912-CA.12810.2024.odt when it was pointed out that the prayer being made by way of civil application is incompatible with the main prayer, wherein, the petitioner has challenged the demand for the entire premium, the learned advocate for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the civil application and instead be permitted to amend the petition.

2.

Heard both the sides.

3.

Civil application is disposed of as withdrawn. 4.

Leave granted to carry out the amendment to be effected within three weeks. The respondent shall file the comprehensive reply within three weeks thereafter.

( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) Tauseef