Arvind Pundlik Dhamne v. Ganesh Suresh Talghatkar And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6596 OF 2018 IN SAST/35444/2017 WITH CA/6597/2018 IN SAST/35444/2017 ARVIND PUNDLIK DHAMNE

VERSUS

GANESH SURESH TALGHATKAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.M. Pingale ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Dated: July 26, 2018 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned counsel for respondents.

2.

Delay of 35 days has caused in filing the second appeal by the appellant. The reasons which are assigned for occurrence of the delay appear to be just and sufficient. I am, therefore, inclined to allow the application. Hence, the following order, -

ORDER

i) The delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned;

ii) Appeal be registered in accordance BDV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD with law;

iii) CA for condonation of delay stands disposed of;

iv) On registration of the appeal, issue notice to the respondents. Shri Gore, learned counsel, waives service for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

3.

Learned counsel for respondents sought time so as to enable him to file affidavit in reply, if any, on behalf of the said respondents.

4.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the execution proceeding, the next date is 23rd August, 2018.

5.

List the matter for further consideration on 13th August, 2018.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ...

BDV