Sunita Dnyaneshwar Bharude v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

ca16437.22 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16437 OF 2022 IN WPST/33260/2021 SUNITA DNYANESHWAR BHARUDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Solanke AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S.K. Tambe Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. P.P. Kothari Advocate for Respondent No.4s : Ms. Pallavi Wangikar h/f Mr. R.V. Gore .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : 3rd MARCH, 2023.

PER COURT :- 1.

The learned Registrar (Judicial) refused registration of the Writ Petition on account of non removal of office objections. 2.

We have heard the learned advocates for the respective sides. The Respondents have strongly opposed this application. 3.

Since the delay of 257 days is neither too large nor does it appear to be deliberate, the same deserves to be condoned in the light of the law laid down by The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and another vs. Mst. Katiji and others, (1987) 2 SCC 107 and Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and

ca16437.22 -2others, 2013 (12) SCC 649.

4.

In view of the above, this Civil Application is allowed. All office objections shall be removed, on or before 18.03.2023. Thereafter, the Writ Petition shall stand restored at the stage at which it was dismissed.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.) rlj/