Indrajit Hiraman Nikalje v. The State Of Maharashtra

(1) criappln-3182.2021 + 2.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 44 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3182 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2021 KAMALBAI W/O. DILIP BANSODE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3183 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2021 SUNITA RAJU SALVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3322 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 695 OF 2021 INDRAJIT HIRAMAN NIKALJE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Rohit P. Patwardhan, Advocate for applicant in Criminal Application No. 3322 of 2021.

Mr.R.D. Sanap, A.P.P. for respondent - State. ...

CORAM :

V.K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE :

06-01-2022.

(2) criappln-3182.2021 + 2.odt ORDER :

1.

Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board.

2.

This motion is moved for Speaking to Minutes of the order dated 03.01.2022 as in the said order, in appearance clause, the appearance of Advocate Mr. Rohit Patwardhan for applicant in Criminal Application No. 3322 of 2021 is not shown inadvertently. 3.

In view of the above, in the same order dated 03.01.2022, the appearance of learned Advocate Mr. Rohit Patwardhan for applicant in Criminal Application No. 3322 of 2021 be shown. Order dated 03.01.2022 stands corrected to that extent only.

4.

Motion stands disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (V.K. JADHAV, J.) VD_Dhirde