Gunvant Annarao Biradar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14807 OF 2019 IN FAST/33931/2019 WITH CA/14820/2019 IN FAST/33923/2019 WITH CA/14812/2019 IN FAST/33927/2019 WITH CA/14816/2019 IN FAST/33919/2019 WITH CA/14811/2019 IN FAST/33929/2019 WITH CA/14813/2019 IN FAST/33935/2019 WITH CA/14810/2019 IN FAST/33925/2019 WITH CA/14808/2019 IN FAST/33820/2019 WITH CA/14809/2019 IN FAST/33915/2019 WITH CA/14821/2019 IN FAST/33917/2019 WITH CA/14814/2019 IN FAST/33933/2019 WITH CA/14815/2019 IN FAST/33921/2019 GUNVANT ANNARAO BIRADAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.

V. Hon, Mr. Sonkawade Shrikant J AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. R.

Yadav - Lonikar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr.Surwase B.R. ......

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 06.10.2022 PER COURT :

Heard. All these respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 1783 days which appears to cause due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications that delay is not properly explained.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants the aforesaid delay period in all these applications stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

Applications are disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-