← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/16533/2022application allowed

Chandrashekhar Ramanjor Mistry And ORS v. Surendranath Matabadar Warma Thr Power Of Attorney Pushkar Ramsumare Mistry Alias Mistry And ORS

2024-02-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

18ca16533.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16533 OF 2022 IN CRAST/32562/2022 CHANDRASHEKHAR RAMANJOR MISTRY AND ORS

VERSUS

SURENDRANATH MATABADAR WARMA THR POWER OF ATTORNEY PUSHKAR RAMSUMARE MISTRY ALIAS MISTRY AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Ziya J. Pathan h/f Mr. Syed Azizoddin R.

Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 : Mr. S.r. Nikam h/f Mr. Yuvraj V. Kakade ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 20th FEBRUARY,2024.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 38 days though not mentioned in the prayer, in preferring this Civil Revision Application. The learned counsel for respondent though raised objection but considering short period of delay, it stands condoned subject to cost of Rs. 500/- to be paid to Advocate's Bar Library. After deposit of cost, the Civil Revision Application be registered after removal of office objections if any. Application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ) JUDGE mahajansb/