Shamrao Anna Pokale v. Union Of India Thr General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai And Others

1 910 to 913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3157 OF 2022 IN FAST/34919/2021 JANU NATHA BHAVAR

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. A. Bide AGP for Respondent No.3: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. B. M. Dhanure ...

ND 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3162 OF 2022 IN FAST/34921/2021 BABU KHANDU KHENGRE (DIED) THR LRS. SINDHUBAI VISHWANATH TALEKAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D. A. Bide AGP for Respondent No.3: Mr. S. R. Yadav Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. R. R. Bangar ...

AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3273 OF 2022 IN FAST/34927/2021 WITH CA/3274/2022 IN FAST/35277/2021 SHAMRAO ANNA POKALE

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. A. Bide AGP for Respondent No.3: Mr. Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. A. T. Jadhavar ...

AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3405 OF 2022 IN FAST/34923/2021

2 910 to 913 BHAGWAN LIMBA MISAL

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. A. Bide AGP for Respondent No.3: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. B. M. Dhanure ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 13/12/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

3.

The learned AGP and the learned counsel for the acquiring body, strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-