Pushpadevi Badrinarayan Dhoot v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through District Collector, Nanded And ORS

{1} 44 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13818 OF 2024 IN FAST/31806/2024 Pushpadevi Badrinarayan Dhoot ....Applicant

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra, Through District Collector, Nanded And Ors .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rakhunde Pravin B AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. V.S. Badakh. Advocate for respondent NO.3 : Mr. R.K. Ingole. CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATE : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2025.

P.C. :- Heard learned advocate for appellant and learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2.

Applicant seeks to condone delay of 384 days caused in filing the appeal. Perused the reasons in para. 2 to 5 of the application. Apparently, applicant is litigating for getting just compensation towards the acquired land. Financial difficulty prevented him from approaching this court within period of limitation. In that view of the matter, sufficient cause is made out. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). Appeal be registered on removal of office objections.

[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J] grt/-