Mohammad Yusuf Abdul Kadar And ORS v. Shamshoddin Yakinoddin And ORS

wp966.11 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 966 OF 2011 MOHAMMAD YUSUF ABDUL KADAR AND ORS

VERSUS

SHAMSHODDIN YAKINODDIN AND ORS ...

Adv. for Petitioners : Mr. Chaitnya C.Deshpande h/f Mr. C.R. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.15 : Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 9th JANUARY, 2018 PER COURT:- 1.

Learned counsel for the respondent-original defendant submits that during pendency of this writ petition the Special Civil Suit No. 48 of 2007 came to be dismissed on 15.11.2017 by the trial court. In view of the same, the cause for filing present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has also not disputed this position. In view of the same writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/