Santuk Marotrao Hambarde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.13617 OF 2017 Dr. Santuk s/o Marotrao Hambarde .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.

..Respondents Mr M.V. Ghatge, Advocate for petitioner Mr P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 4 Mr V.P. Latange, Advocate for respondent no.5 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ DATE : 2nd May 2018 PER COURT 1.

Mr Ghatge submits that after filing of the present Writ Petition, University has forwarded the proposal and states that the earlier service rendered on contract basis be considered regular and be counted for the purpose of pension.

2.

The respondent no.2 shall now take decision upon the pension proposal of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within four months. The petitioner may apply to the respondent no.5 - University for any correction, if required and the University shall thereafter consider the application of the petitioner for correction in the proposal within four weeks from the date of receipt of the application.

3.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) vvr