Syed Sailani @ Babbu Syed Ibrahim v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1997 OF 2024 SYED SAILANI @ BABBU SYED IBRAHIM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. H. I. Pathan APP for Respondents-State : Mr. A. A. A. Khan ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 09.01.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondents-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 301 of 2024, dated 11.09.2024 registered at Kandhar Police Station, District Nanded, for the offences punishable under sections 326(g), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3] The allegation against the present applicant is that he has set on fire the shop of the complainant and caused loss of Rs. 50,000/- to 60,000/-. There is inconsistency in the statement of witness as regards the applicants presence at the place of occurrence. 4] Considering the totality of the circumstances,

the applicant is granted anticipatory bail on following terms and conditions :

i] In the event the applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No. 301 of 2024, dated 11.09.2024 registered at Kandhar Police Station, District Nanded, for the offences punishable under sections 326(g), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

ii] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station on 22.01.2025 and 23.01.2025 between 10.30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

iii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iv] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

6] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be

cancelled.

7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE PRW