Vaibhav @ Shrirang Kailasrao Sawandkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
2024:BHC-AUG:933 {1} drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 Vaibhav @ Shrirang Kailasrao Sawandkar APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1788 OF 2023 Mahesh Pintu Jadhav APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS .......
Mr. B. N. Magar - Patil, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for respondent - State .......
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1800 OF 2023 Vaibhav Prabhakar Dhage APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS .......
Mr. G. R. Ingole, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for respondent - State .......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 17 th JANUARY, 2024 ORDER :
{2} 1.
Applicants are apprehending arrest in Crime No. 366 of 2023 registered with Bhagyanagar Police Station, Nanded for offence punishable under section 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2.
FIR is lodged by Vishranti Balaji Rakh alleging that Aditya Chandrakant Pawar and present applicants assaulted her son Kaustubh. Aditya used iron rod in the said assault and applicants gave slaps and fists blows to Kaustubh.
3.
Heard learned advocates for applicants and learned APP for the State. Perused the papers of investigation. 4.
Applicants are students against whom general allegations are levelled that they gave slaps and fists blows to son of informant. Aditya, to whom assault with iron rod on the jaw of Kaustubh is attributed, was arrested and he is released on bail. 5.
Considering the allegations against applicants and on perusal of the investigation papers, custodial interrogation of applicants is not necessary in the facts of the present case. Applicants are students and their future will be marred if they are arrested in present crime. Applicants have co-operated in the
{3} investigation, after interim protection was granted to the them. 6.
In that view of the matter, applications are allowed by confirming the interim protection granted to applicants. 7.
Till filing of the charge sheet, applicants shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer. Applications shall not tamper prosecution evidence. [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/aba1783-23.doc