The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Gangadhar Kachru Jadhav

925 delay.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15304 OF 2017 IN FAST/36098/2017 WITH CA/15306/2017 IN FAST/36086/2017 WITH CA/15308/2017 IN FAST/36092/2017 WITH CA/15310/2017 IN FAST/36108/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

SMITA SHANKARRAO PAHAL ...

A.G.P. for Applicants : Mr. A.M.Phule.

Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Kayyum N. Shaikh.

CORAM

: K. L. WADANE, J.

DATE :

21st December, 2017 ORDER:

1.

These are the applications for condonation of delay caused for filing First Appeals.

2.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicants as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to condone the delay.

3.

For the reasons recorded in the applications, applications are allowed. Delay caused for filing 1/2

925 delay.odt First Appeals is condoned.

4.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(K.L.WADANE,J.) mkd 2/2