← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/12571/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

City And Industrial Development Corporation Waluj Mahanagar Prakalp 1 Cidco Aurangabad v. Bansi Madhavrao Sale And ANR

2025-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:9165 (1) 46-ca-12571-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12571 OF 2024 IN FAST/32066/2024 CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WALUJ MAHANAGAR PRAKALP 1 CIDCO AURANGABAD

VERSUS

BANSI MADHAVRAO SALE AND ANR ...

Mr. Shambhuraje V Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondents-State.

Mr. D. M. Pingale, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : 27th MARCH, 2025.

P.C.:- 1.

Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties. 2.

By this application, applicants seek to condone delay of 86 days caused in fling Appeal.

3.

Perused application and reasons as stated therein. Delay appears to have been occasioned on account of administrative exigency. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. Hence, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order:

ORDER

a.

Civil Application is allowed.

b.

Delay of 86 days caused in filing Appeal is hereby condoned. c.

Appeal be registered subject.

(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/March-2025