Ashok Tilak Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 935-CA-2834-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2834 OF 2020 IN FAST/35362/2018 ASHOK TILAK PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr Y.R. Neb h/f Mr Ajeet B.Kale AGP for Respondent No.1/State : Mr S.J. Salgare Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr S.B. Kadu CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATE : 24-02-2023 PER COURT :

1.

The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 651 days caused in filing the appeal against the award passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon in LAR No. 88/2004.

2.

The learned advocate appearing for the applicant submits that the delay caused in filing the appeal is not intentional. He invites attention of this Court to the reasons mentioned in para Nos. 2 to 4 and would submit that the delay needs to be condoned.

3.

The learned advocate appearing for the respondents opposed to condone the delay on the ground that the delay has not been properly explained. In alternative, he would submit that in case the delay is condoned, the applicant shall not be entitled to claim the interest for the delayed period.

2 935-CA-2834-2020 4.

Having considered the submissions of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and reasons specified in para Nos. 2 to 4 of the civil application, the application is allowed. The delay of 651 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not be entitled to claim the interest for the period of delay in case his prayer for enhancement of compensation is accepted by this Court in Appeal. The appeal be registered.

[ S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] mta