Macchindra Amrut Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
{1} wp1225916.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12259 OF 2016 Macchindra Amrut Patil Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.M.A.Patil, advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.S.Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.4 & 5. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 14th December, 2016 PER COURT:
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.
No case is made out for causing interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of substance and as such stands dismissed. After petitioner resumes duty in pursuance to the order passed by the Zilla Parishad, RespondentZilla Parishad shall take steps for releasing salary admissible to the petitioner.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1225916