Laxmibai Shamrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2201 OF 2020 IN FAST/35409/2018 LAXMIBAI SHAMRAO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr.B.

V.

Virdhe ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 09.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 669 days which appears to be caused due to her financial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay. The learned counsel for respondent -Acquiring Body despite appearance, remained absent. 2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 669 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly on the enhanced compensation, if granted.

3.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-