Savita W/O Hareram Kadu v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:27641 1 43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 43 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1890 OF 2024 UMESH ARUN KALE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2024 VITHAL YAMAJI YADAV AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1893 OF 2024 VAIBHAV SURESH YADAV AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1894 OF 2024 SURESH VITTHAL YADAV AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

AND ...

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4660 OF 2024 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4658 OF 2024 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4657 OF 2024 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4656 OF 2024 ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar APP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar Advocate for assist to PP: Mr. Vikram S. Kadam ...

2 43 CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2024 PER COURT:

1.

Criminal Applications No.4660 of 2024, 4658 of 2024, 4657 of 2024 and 4656 of 2024 for assist to Public Prosecutor are allowed. 2.

The post-mortem report indicates that the death being caused due to head injury caused by hard and blunt impact. The medical report also indicates that there is brutal assault. The applicants are prima facie connected with the offence as is reflected from the FIR. As such, the case requires proper investigation and custodial interrogation of the applicants is necessary.

3.

The Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe