Sayyad Habib Sayyad Lal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4298 OF 2020 IN FAST/35490/2018 SAYYAD HABIB SAYYAD LAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sakolkar Vijay G.

and Mr. H.B. Nandagawale AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. A. B. Chate ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 10.11.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respondent No. 2 -Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1119 days which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

3.

However considering the statutory right of the application the delay of 1119 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for such delay period and also

for the delay in taking circulation belatedly. 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any and the copy of this order be placed with the appeal. 5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-