The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Maya Rajendra Marale

wp4625.20.odt - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4625 OF 2020 The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Petitioner

Versus

Maya Rajendra Marale Respondent Mr. Dipesh Patil, Advocate holding for Mr. D.S.Bagul, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM : M.G. Sewlikar, J.

DATE : 11th February, 2021.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard Shri Dipesh Patil, learned counsel holding for Shri D.S. Bagul, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

The learned Member, Industrial Court, Latur, has observed that the transfer is by way of punishment. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out that it was not by way of punishment but by way of administrative convenience. Under the garb of administrative convenience, the transfer is being made by way of punishment.

wp4625.20.odt - 2 - 3.

I do not fnd any substance in the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) JUDGE dyb