Chandraprabhu Bhikaji Husse And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Anothers

wp11889.15 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11889 OF 2015 Chandraprabhu s/o Bhikaji Husse & ors.

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

..RESPONDENTS Mr P.K. Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr V. S. Khairnar, Advocate for petitioners;

Mrs M. A. Deshpande, A. G. P. for respondent No. 1; Mr R. L. Chintalwar, Advocate for respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

We have heard Mr Joshi, learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.P. so also Mr Chintalwar, learned Counsel for respondent No. 2. 2.

Learned A.G.P. and Mr Chintalwar, learned Counsel for respondent No. 2 raised preliminary objection that the petitioner has remedy under Industrial Disputes Act.

wp11889.15 (2) 3.

In view of that though Mr Joshi, learned Counsel for petitioners sought to canvass the submissions on merits, we are not inclined to consider the same.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy. The contentions of the respective parties are kept open. The Forum, where the proceedings will be filed, shall consider the time spent for prosecuting the present proceedings. No costs. (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Tupe