Aruna Shivprasad Gagrani v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

940.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7961 OF 2017 IN X-OBJST/37022/2015 WITH CA/14906/2015 IN XOBJST/33101/2015 WITH CA/14909/2015 IN XOBJST/31877/2015 WITH CA/14967/2015 IN XOBJST/33107/2015 WITH CA/15592/2015 IN XOBJST/33080/2015 WITH CA/15593/2015 IN XOBJST/33082/2015 WITH CA/15602/2015 IN XOBJST/33105/2015 WITH CA/15603/2015 IN XOBJST/28978/2015 WITH CA/15604/2015 IN XOBJST/33084/2015 WITH CA/15607/2015 IN XOBJST/28976/2015 WITH CA/15608/2015 IN XOBJST/33096/2015 WITH CA/15610/2015 IN XOBJST/28980/2015 WITH CA/15611/2015 IN XOBJST/33099/2015 WITH CA/15612/2015 IN XOBJST/28974/2015 WITH CA/15733/2015 IN XOBJST/33094/2015 WITH CA/15921/2015 IN XOBJST/33087/2015 WITH CA/16529/2015 IN XOBJST/35893/2015 WITH CA/16757/2015 IN XOBJST/35929/2015 WITH CA/16773/2015 IN XOBJST/35942/2015 WITH CA/16777/2015 IN XOBJST/35945/2015 WITH CA/234/2016 IN X-OBJST/35951/2015 WITH CA/7962/2017 IN X-OBJST/33089/2015 WITH CA/7964/2017 IN X-OBJST/33092/2015 RAMESHWAR SHESHRAO KACHARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. A.M. Phule, B.A. Shinde, S.S. Dande.

Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S.G. Bhalerao.

CORAM

: K. L. WADANE, J.

DATE :

6th September, 2017 ORDER:

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay. Perused the contents of the application. It appears that the applicant was prevented from certain causes such as financial constrain. Therefore, he/she was 1/2

940.odt unable to prefer the cross-objection within prescribed period of limitation.

2.

Learned counsels appearing for the respondents have opposed the application, as the delay has not been explained satisfactorily.

3.

In view of the submissions made by the respective counsels and in view of the observations of Supreme Court in the case of Ramanlal Deochand Shah v/s. State of Maharashtra, and another, reported in AIR 2013 SC 3452, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. Delay caused in filing cross objection is hereby condoned. The applicant shall not be entitled for the amount of interest, other statutory benefits for the period for which the delay is sought to be condoned.

4.

In view of the above, the delay caused in filing the cross-objection is hereby condoned. Civil applications are accordingly disposed of.

5.

The matters be referred to the Lok-Adalat scheduled to be held on 09.09.2017.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) mkd 2/2