Shaikh Faiyaz Ajijoddin v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

dyb 1 WP12911-18dt 26-11-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12911 OF 2018 Ashwini w/o Sachin Jadhav ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

Respondents Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.W. Munde, AGP for Respondent no. 1.

Mr. S.T.Shelke, Advocate for Respondent no. 2. Mr. A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for Respondent no. 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12913 OF 2018 Shaikh Faiyaz Ajijoddin ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

Respondents Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.W. Munde, AGP for Respondent no. 1.

Mr. S.T.Shelke, Advocate for Respondent no. 2. Mr. A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for Respondent no. 3.

dyb 2 WP12911-18dt 26-11-2018 Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.

Date : 26 November 2018.

Per Court :

1.

By this petition, petitioners are challenging acceptance of nomination form of respondents-candidates.

2.

According to petitioners, respondents-candidates were in arrears of dues payable to the Municipal Corporation. 3.

Considering the fact that the election process has already commenced and the matter will require adjudication of facts and that the petitioners have alternate remedy of filing election petition, writ petitions are disposed of keeping said liberty open. N.M. Jamdar, J.