Sandip Babasaheb Dahiphale And ORS v. Ashwini Sandip Dahiphale Thr Jagannath Raghunath Avhad
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16860 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 33423 OF 2022 Sandip s/o Balasaheb Dahiphale and others Applicants
Versus
Sow. Ashwini Sandip Dahiphale Respondent Mr. R. R. Karpe, advocate for the Applicants Mr. V. P. Narwade, advocate holding for Mr. R. B. Temak, advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 04th January, 2023.
PC :
Heard rival submissions.
The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of only 16 days, which, according to them, caused due to fling the matter under wrong category.
Though the learned Counsel for the Respondent strongly opposed the application, but considering the short period of delay, it stands condoned.
The appeal be placed for admission after removal
{2} of offce objections, if any.
Civil Application is disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb
{3}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16862 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 33423 OF 2022 Sandip s/o Balasaheb Dahiphale and others Applicants
Versus
Sow. Ashwini Sandip Dahiphale Respondent Mr. R. R. Karpe, advocate for the Applicants Mr. V. P. Narwade, advocate holding for Mr. R. B. Temak, advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 04th January, 2023.
PC :
Since learned Counsel for the appellant undertakes to remove all the offce objections within a period of two weeks, the ad interim relief granted vide order dated 14th December, 2022, is continued till then.
Stand over to 18.01.2023.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb