← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/464/2024disposed off

Sanjay Ganeshlal Bhansali And Others v. Manager Alias Project Manager Indarkumar Pande Monto Karlo Co Ltd And Another

2025-06-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit W. Joshi2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:16572 921-wp-464-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 464 OF 2024 1.

Sanjay Ganeshlal Bhansali Age : 56 years, Occu - Agril. & Business Mob.9423141979 2.

Sou. Suman W/o Sanjay Bhansali, Age - 53 years, Occu. - Agril, Both R/o. - Ajay Nagar, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli 3.

Prakash S/o Bhaurao Ghumnar Age : 54 years, Occu - Agril, R/o.- Kalgao, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli,

...Petitioners

VERSUS

1.

Manager @ Project Manager Indarkumar Pande, Monto Karlo Co Ltd.

Malhivra campus, Hingoli, Mo.No.8080734021.

2.

Main Vyavasthapak, Monto Karlo Co. House Sindhu Bhavan Rad, Bodakdev, Ahemadabad (Gujrat)

...Respondents

...

Mr. A M. Gholap h/f. Mr. G. C. Navandar, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. M. R. Puranik & Mr. B. S. Dhawale, Advcoate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

...

CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.

DATED :

24th JUNE 2025 JUDGEMENT :- 1.

The learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli while Narwade

921-wp-464-2024 -2upholding objections raised by the defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.200 of 2022 in relation to existence of arbitration agreement warranting reference of the dispute to arbitration in view of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has held that there is a valid arbitration agreement between the parties and the dispute is also arbitrable.

2.

Having so held, the learned Judge has proceeded to dismiss the suit rather than referring the parties for arbitration as per Section 8 of the Act. The petitioner/original plaintiff is aggrieved by the said order.

3.

Having regard to the relevant statutory provisions, this Court is of the opinion that the learned Judge has erred in dismissing the suit. The order dated 25.04.2023 is accordingly quashed and set aside and the parties are referred for arbitration of the dispute as per Section 8 of the Act.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

[ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade