Narayan Mahadu Sonawane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 911 CA-2087.2022 & ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2087 OF 2022 IN FAST/7462/2020 DAGU GANPATRAO SURASE THR SON RAOSAHEB DAGADU SURASE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3383 OF 2022 IN FAST/31520/2019 SATISH MANSUBRAO UBALE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5736 OF 2022 IN FAST/34993/2019 NARAYAN MAHADU SONAWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6191 OF 2022 IN FAST/34990/2019 PARASRAM DAGADU DOLAS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A.B. Chate and Mr. S.N. Kendre AGPs for respondent State in respective applications.

Mr. Ram Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2 in Civil Application No. 2087 of 2022.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

14th June 2023.

(2) 911 CA-2087.2022 & ors.odt ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned AGP as well as learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body in one matter strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods and there is also circulation delay.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matters belatedly.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde