Digamber Vishwanath Gangawane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 903 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.13516 OF 2017 DIGAMBER VISHWANATH GANGAWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shirish M. Kamble; AGP for respondents no.1: Mrs. M.A. Deshpande; Advocate for respondent no.2 : Mr. S.P. Shah. CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ.

AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2022.

P.C.:- 1.

The period for which the respondent no.3 was nominated to be a member of the Senate of the University has expired. By efflux of time, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving open all questions on fact and law that have been urged in this writ petition open. No costs.

3.

We make it clear that if the respondent no.3 is once again nominated but continues to suffer from any disqualification, as claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty pursue his remedy in accordance with law.

[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] grt/-