Pralhad S/O Chandar Suryavanshi And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

6618.2015 Cri.Appln.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6618 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.726 OF 2014 ...

PRALHAD CHANDER SURYAVANSHI & OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Ajinkya Reddy APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S.R.Yadav Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sanjay V. Mundhe ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M.BADAR, JJ.

Dated: December 23, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1] This Application is filed for speaking to minutes. According to the learned counsel appearing for the applicants / petitioners, while granting interim relief, inadvertently, instead of prayer clause-C, prayer clause-D is typed.

2] The learned APP appearing for the respondent / State and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 fairly concede that, it is inadvertent mistake.

3] In that view of the matter, in the order dated 22nd January, 2015 passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.726/2014 in clause No.2 line No.4, instead of

6618.2015 Cri.Appln.

prayer clause-D, prayer clause-C be substituted. Accordingly necessary correction be made. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly.

4] Necessary writ be issued. Motion is disposed of.

( A.M.BADAR, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ...

DDC