← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14087/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Maharu Chindha Patil And ORS v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Authorized Signatory, Aurangabad

2019-12-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14087 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.7982 OF 2018 (Maharu Chindha Patil and others Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Authorized Signatory, Aurangabad) ---- Mr. Chetan V. Bhadane, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.1 ---- CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 03.12.2019 PER COURT :

The original claimants are seeking withdrawal of the amount of compensation deposited by the Insurance Company in this Court. 2.

The learned Advocate for the Insurance Company submits that it is coming with a specific defence of breach of terms and conditions of the contract inasmuch as the driver was not holding valid and effective driving licence to drive the vehicle of the kind involved in the accident. It is also submitted that there is a dispute about the quantum of compensation assessed by the Tribunal.

3.

In my view, considering the conspectus of the matter, the applicants deserve to be paid 75% of the amount of compensation.

ca14087-2019 4.

The application is allowed. The applicants are allowed to withdraw 75% of the amount of compensation deposited in this Court by furnishing an undertaking on usual terms.

[MANGESH S. PATIL] JUDGE npj/ca14087-2019