Prakash Ramhari Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
2024:BHC-AUG:29115 1 923-CA-4964-20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4964 OF 2020 IN FAST/35971/2018 PUNJABAI KACHRU SHINGARE (DIED) THROUGH LRS UTTAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4972 OF 2020 IN FAST/35952/2018 MANSARAM TANHA MEVAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4969 OF 2020 IN FAST/35954/2018 MADAN BALCHAND MEHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4970 OF 2020 IN FAST/35958/2018 MEENABAI BHASKAR KHARAT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4967 OF 2020 IN FAST/35960/2018 ANNA SAYAJI SHINGARE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
2 923-CA-4964-20.odt AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4974 OF 2020 IN FAST/35962/2018 RUKHMANBAI DNYANESHWAR PAWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4966 OF 2020 IN FAST/35965/2018 DNYANESHWAR KACHRU PAWAR AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4965 OF 2020 IN FAST/35969/2018 KAILAS RAMHARI CHAVAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4973 OF 2020 IN FAST/35973/2018 PRAKASH RAMHARI CHAVAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Abhishek M. Hajare, Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.D. Raut, AGP for Respondents/State ...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2024 PER COURT :
1.
These applications are filed for condonation of delay of 2050 days caused in filing first appeals seeking enhancement of compensation.
3 923-CA-4964-20.odt 2.
Learned advocate for applicants states that in connected matters arising out of same acquisition, this Court has condoned the delay vide order dated 18/12/2019, passed in Civil Application No.9261/2019.
3.
None appears for third respondent, though served. Learned AGP has strenuously opposed the applications stating that the delay is not properly explained and hence, the applications deserve to be rejected.
4.
For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is condoned. Applications are allowed, on condition that applicants shall not be entitled for the interest for period of delay. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)