Acharya Vinoba Bhave Education Society Through Its Secretary And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:12779-DB 94-wp-54-2023.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 94 WRIT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2023 1.

Acharya Vinoba Bhave Education Society, Sambhaji Nagar, Latur, Through its Secretary.

2.

Aided Primary and Secondary Ashram School, Marki (Bk.), Tq. Zari (Jamni), Dist. Yeotmal, Through its Head Master .. Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.

The Commissioner, Tribal Development Commissionerate, Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, Nashik-2.

3.

The Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Amrawati-444602.

4.

The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Pandharkawada, Tq. Kelapur, Dist. Yeotmal.

5.

Rajesh L. Dhanorkar, Age: Major, Occu.: Service, R/o. Aided Primary & Secondary Ashram School, Marki (Bk.) Tq. Zari (Jamni), Dist. Yeotmal.

.. Respondents ...

Mr. K. P. Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Dawalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 - State. ...

[1]

94-wp-54-2023.docx CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 1 JULY 2024 ORDER :- Heard.

2.

Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that since respondent No.5 has not joined, the petitioners are not pressing for prayer clause 'B' and would contended that the direction is to be issued in the light of prayer clause 'C' to the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the proposals for grant of approval to the appointments made by it.

3.

In case the proposals dated 30.09.2022 (Exhibit-I) collectively are not decided yet, the respondents to take appropriate decision on the proposals in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of six weeks.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]