← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13646/2019admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Rawassa Construction, Engineers And Contractors Through It S Partner Anees E. Khatri v. State Of Maharashtra Through District Collector, Dhule And Other

2019-12-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

13646.19ca (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13646 OF 2019 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.10 OF 2019 Rawassa Construction, Engineers & Contractors ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr N. P. Runwal, Advocate for applicant;

Mr S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondents/State CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 13th December, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader appearing on behalf of all the respondents, who are the State authorities.

2.

Delay of 31 days caused in filing the Commercial Appeal is sought to be explained in para Nos.4 to 6. It is also submitted that the delay caused is due to bona fide reasons and the same was not intentional or deliberate act.

3.

Learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader opposes the application.

13646.19ca (2) 4.

In view of the submissions of learned Counsel for the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and the same is disposed of accordingly. (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) sjk