Kakasaheb Baburao Thombre v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1 905, 906, ca 605-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.605 OF 2018 IN FAST/36870/2017 KAKASAHEB BABURAO THOMBRE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. M. Pingale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. R. Yadav Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. C.P. Kutti ....

AND 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3162 OF 2018 IN FAST/36867/2017 HARNABAI DAGDUBA KOTHARE (DIED) THR LRS BHIMRAO D KOTHARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. M. Pingale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. C.P. Kutti ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 04/10/2022.

P. C. :

IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.605 OF 2018 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3162 OF 2018 :

1.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

2 905, 906, ca 605-18 2.

The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the application are condoned subject to condition that the claimants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. 4.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. The application is accordingly disposed of. IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.36870 OF 2017 AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 36867 OF 2017 :

1.

Heard.

2.

Call R & P.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-