← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13888/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Ganesh Baliram Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

1 wp 13888.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13888 OF 2019 Ganesh Baliram Kamble .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13916 OF 2019 Rahul Madhavrao Kiwande .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri D. S. Mali, Advocate for the Petitioner in both matters. Mrs. Rashmi P. Gaur, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in both matters.

Shri Ganesh A. Gadhe, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5 in W. P. No. 13916 of 2019.

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE :

25TH FEBRURY 2020.

FINAL ORDER :

.

The proposals seeking approval to the appointments of the petitioners are rejected on the ground that for the academic year 2018-2019 three posts of assistant teachers became vacant. 2.

On the last date, we had asked the learned Assistant Government Pleader to take instructions in which year the posts

2 wp 13888.19 were reduced. Affidavit has been filed. According to the learned A. G. P. posts of three Assistant Teachers stood reduced in the academic year 2018-2019.

3.

The staffing pattern as applicable for the year 2013-2014 would be relevant to be considered.

4.

In the light of the above, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The Education Officer shall reconsider the proposals seeking approval to the appointments of the petitioners considering staffing pattern as it stood for the academic year 2013-2014. So also the Education Officer shall consider the order passed in earlier writ petitions filed by petitioners bearing Writ Petition No. 5798 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 5771 of 2017 decided under order dated 18.06.2018. Said decision shall be taken expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (04) months from today.

5.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Feb. 20