Shivkumar Ramchandra Biradar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 904 CA-14971.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14971 OF 2019 IN FAST/34204/2019 WITH CA/14980/2019 IN FAST/35406/2019 WITH CA/14975/2019 IN FAST/35414/2019 WITH CA/14972/2019 IN FAST/35400/2019 WITH CA/14981/2019 IN FAST/35418/2019 WITH CA/14979/2019 IN FAST/35402/2019 WITH CA/14973/2019 IN FAST/35396/2019 WITH CA/14977/2019 IN FAST/35410/2019 WITH CA/14974/2019 IN FAST/35429/2019 WITH CA/14978/2019 IN FAST/35421/2019 WITH CA/14976/2019 IN FAST/35424/2019 VENKAT MAHALAPPA INCHURE (GHOGARE) DIED THROUGH LRS RAJKUMAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Shrikant Sonkawade, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A.A. Jagatkar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Ms. K.M. Daskhedkar, Advocate holding for Mr. R.C. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

07.10.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard the rival submissions. All the respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in their respective applications. The delay appears to be caused due to their fnancial crisis.

2.

The learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel appearing for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that delay is not properly explained.

(2) 904 CA-14971.2019.odt 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the respective delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods.

4.

The respective appeals be placed for admission, after removal of offce objections, if any.

5.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde