Murlidhar Dattatraya Choudhari v. Goverdhan Baliram Karpe And ORS

1 917 ca 13769-19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13769 OF 2019 IN FAST/35472/2019 WITH CA/13770/2019 IN FAST/35472/2019 MURLIDHAR DATTATRAYA CHOUDHARI

VERSUS

GOVERDHAN BALIRAM KARPE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. T. Jadhav h/f Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 : Mr. M. U. Shelke ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 03/08/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Heard.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 234 days caused since his lawyer did not intimate him about the pending proceeding. The learned counsel for respondents/claimants strongly opposed the application.

3.

As such, for the reasons stated in the application and considering statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 234 days caused in fling First Appeal against award dated 24/12/2018 in MACP No. 25 of 2014 stands condoned. Application is accordingly disposed of.

4.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-