Nikita Prashant Dhumal v. Prashant Tukaram Dhumal

2025:BHC-AUG:11886 ( 1 ) mca353.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 353 OF 2024 NIKITA PRASHANT DHUMAL

VERSUS

PRASHANT TUKARAM DHUMAL Mr. S.K. Chavan, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. P.P. More, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 23.04.2025 PC :- 01.

Heard learned Advocates for the parties. This application is preferred by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of matrimonial proceeding from the Court of Ld. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna to the Court of Ld. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Basmatnagar. The wife is staying with her daughter of five years of age. It is, therefore, stated that it is difficult for her to attend the Court at Jalna. 02.

Learned Advocate for the respondent vehemently opposes the application. He submits that the applicant-wife can very well travel to Jalna. The respondent is ready to bear travelling expenses of the applicant-wife.

03.

However, considering that it is the convenience of the wife that should be seen in such matter, this Court is inclined to allow this application. Hence, following order :-

( 2 ) mca353.24

ORDER

(i) The Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

(ii) The applicant wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. If the Trial Court finds that the adjournments are unnecessarily sought by the applicant-wife, the Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders to compensate the respondent-husband if he personally remains present in the Court.

(iii) After transfer of the proceeding, the Trial Court shall try to dispose off the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within 18 months from the date of transfer. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2025/apr25/mca353.24