← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/16632/2016disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Jai Malhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Nanded Through Its Secretary G D Suryawanshi And Others

2017-02-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

ca16632.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16632 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.112 OF 2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NOS.9188/2013 WITH WP/6727/2015 WITH WP/8010/2015 WITH WP/8012/2015 WITH WP/8013/2015 WITH WP/8017/2015 WITH WP/8418/2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8435/2015 WITH WP/8436/2015 WITH WP/8462/2015 WITH WP/8465/2015 WITH WP/8941/2015 WITH WP/8944/2015 WITH WP/8945/2015 WITH WP/8949/2015 WITH WP/9274/2015 WITH WP/9291/2015 WITH WP/9293/2015 WITH WP/9294/2015 WITH WP/9295/2015 WITH WP/9297/2015 WITH WP/9303/2015 WITH WP/9304/2015 WITH WP/9305/2015 WITH WP/9306/2015 WITH WP/9453/2015 WITH WP/9467/2015 WITH WP/9471/2015 WITH WP/9697/2015 WITH WP/9698/2015 WITH WP/9701/2015 WITH WP/10090/2015 WITH WP/10216/2015 WITH WP/10217/2015 WITH WP/10226/2015 WITH WP/10320/2015 WITH WP/10321/2015 WITH WP/11478/2015 WITH WP/11503/2015 WITH WP/11607/2015 WITH WP/11621/2015 WITH WP/12121/2015 WITH WP/65/2016 The State of Maharashtra and another.

...APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Jai Malhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Nanded and others.

...RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Applicants.

Mr.S.E. Gastgar Advocate for Respondent No.1. ...

ca16632.16 CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2017 ORDER :

.

Heard. We do not see any reason to entertain this Application since no error apparent on the face of record is brought to our notice. Hence the Application stands rejected.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] asb/FEB17