Pradip Sahebrao Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:34601-DB 945-Cri-Appln-4384-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4384 OF 2022 PRADIP SAHEBRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ....

None for the Applicants Mr. S. R. Wakale, APP for the Respondent - State Mr. V. B. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : December 10, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions, submits that the learned trial Judge has commenced the trial and three witnesses are also examined. 2.

The record shows that despite grant of sufficient opportunity the applicants did not proceed with the matter. On last occasion also, nobody was present. Today, there is nobody to work out the matter. Thus it appears that the applicants are not interested in proceeding with the matter. On last occasion also, nobody was present.

(( 2 )) 945-Cri-Appln-4384-2022 3.

Today, there is nobody to workout the matter. Thus, it appears that the applicants are not interested in proceeding with the matter.

4.

As such, the Criminal Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

5.

The fees of the appointed counsel for respondent No.2 be quantified as per rules and be paid to him, expeditiously. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ] SMS