← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/357/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Syeda Mehnaaz Fatema Syed Imran And ORS v. Tata Aig General Insurnace Co Ltd Through Its Branch Manager And ORS

2025-04-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar1 pages

{1} 68 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2025 IN FAST/33058/2024 Syeda Mehnaaz Fatema Syed Imran And Ors ....Applicant

VERSUS

Tata Aig General Insurnace Co Ltd Through Its Branch Manager And Ors .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Kayyum Najir CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2025.

ORDER :- 1.

Heard learned advocate for applicant.

2.

Applicants seek to condone delay of 94 days caused in filing appeal. Notice of civil application is served upon respondents. However, none appears for them. Perused application and reasons stated therein. 3.

The applicants are litigating for getting just compensation towards death of bread earner of family. Delay caused is not intentional. Applicants have not derived any benefit by making delay. Hence, application deserves to be allowed. Same is allowed. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J] grt/-